Volume 2, Issue 3 December 2019, pp. 110-134
The effect of cohesive features in integrated and independent L2 writing quality and text classification
Cohesion features were calculated for a corpus of 960 essays by 480 test-takers from the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) in order to examine differences in the use of cohesion devices between integrated (source-based) writing and independent writing samples. Cohesion indices were measured using an automated textual analysis tool, the Tool for the Automatic Assessment of Cohesion (TAACO). A discriminant function analysis correctly classified essays as either integrated or independent in 92.3 per cent of cases. Integrated writing was marked by higher use of specific connectives and greater lexical overlap of content words between textual units, whereas independent writing was marked by greater lexical overlap of function words, especially pronouns. Regression analyses found that cohesive indices which distinguish tasks predict writing quality judgments more strongly in independent writing. However, the strongest predictor of human judgments was the same for both tasks: lexical overlap of function words. The findings demonstrate that text cohesion is a multidimensional construct shaped by the writing task, yet the measures of cohesion which affect human judgments of writing quality are not entirely different across tasks. These analyses allow us to better understand cohesive features in writing tasks and implications for automated writing assessment.
© Rurik Tywoniw, Scott Crossley
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Rurik Tywoniw, Scott Crossley. (2019). The effect of cohesive features in integrated and independent L2 writing quality and text classification. Language Education & Assessment, 2(3), 110-134. https://doi.org/10.29140/lea.v2n3.151
"I don't want to be stereotypical, but..."
Norwegian EFL learners' awareness of and willingness to challenge visual stereotypes
Cecilie Waallann Brown
Intercultural Communication Education Published: 20 December, 2019, Volume 2(3), pp. 120-141.
"Writing like a health scientist": A translingual approach to teaching text structure in a diverse Australian classroom
Sue Ollerhead, Isobel Crealy, Rebecca Kirk
Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics Published: 30 April, 2020, Volume 3(1), pp. 77-90.
(Re)imagining a course in language and intercultural communication for the 21st century
Adriana Raquel Diaz, Paul J. Moore
Intercultural Communication Education Published: 29 December, 2018, Volume 1(3), pp. 83-99.
A day in the life: Mapping international students' language learning environments in multilingual Sydney
Phil Benson, Philip Chappell, Lynda Yates
Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics Published: 1 April, 2018, Volume 1(1), pp. 20-32.
A developmental framework for online language teaching skills
Ursula Stickler, Regine Hampel, Martina Emke
Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics Published: 30 April, 2020, Volume 3(1), pp. 133-151.
A systematic review of written corrective feedback research in ESL/EFL contexts
Sin Wang Chong
Language Education & Assessment Published: 31 August, 2019, Volume 2(2), pp. 57-69.
Adopting a dual focus to drive forward the fields of language education and language assessment
Heng-Tsung Danny Huang
Language Education & Assessment Published: 25 July, 2018, Volume 1(1), pp. 1-2.
Advancing intercultural learning in world language education: Recent developments in pre-service teacher education in the U.S.
Intercultural Communication Education Published: 29 December, 2018, Volume 1(3), pp. 110-122.
An essay on internationalism in foreign language education
Intercultural Communication Education Published: 22 August, 2018, Volume 1(2), pp. 64-82.
An investigation of implicit vs. explicit oral corrective feedback on Chinese pupils' use of past tense
Qin Xie, Chingyee Yeung
Language Education & Assessment Published: 29 November, 2018, Volume 1(2), pp. 59-75.