Formulation processes of monolingual, bilingual, and biliterate writers: Effects of biliteracy

Downloads

Published

2020-12-31

Section: Regular Articles

How to Cite

Formulation processes of monolingual, bilingual, and biliterate writers: Effects of biliteracy. (2020). Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(3), 213-232. https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v3n3.353

Authors

  • Elaine Ng Email ORCiD The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v3n3.353

Abstract

By looking beyond their written products into what they do as they write, this mixed methods study offers insights into the writing process of writers who have mastered one language and those who have mastered two. It investigates the cognitive effects of bilingualism and biliteracy on the writing processes of years ten and eleven Sydney high school writers across three groups (N = 30): English monolinguals, Chinese-English bilinguals, and Chinese-English biliterates, focusing on their formulation processes (i.e., how thoughts are converted into language and the written form). Findings indicate distinctive features and patterns of writing behaviours, possibly reflecting specific strengths and weaknesses for each group. The monolinguals demonstrated strategic use of vocabulary, while the biliterates and bilinguals demonstrated prospective and retrospective behaviours when formulating. These findings are discussed in light of studies on the writing process and on the effects of bilingualism.


Keywords: writing processes, formulation processes, problem-solving formulation, bilingualism, biliteracy

Suggested Citation:

Formulation processes of monolingual, bilingual, and biliterate writers: Effects of biliteracy. (2020). Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(3), 213-232. https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v3n3.353

References

Similar Articles

1-10 of 44

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.